Reliability of Neuronavigation in Localizing the Internal Acoustic Canal during Middle Fossa Approach

Abstract

Objective The absence of precise landmarks in the middle fossa floor and frequent anatomical variations make it difficult to localize the internal acoustic canal (IAC) during the middle fossa approach (MFA). We aimed to investigate the reliability and utility of the neuronavigation system (NNS) in the MFA and to delineate specific technical considerations regarding NNS during the approach.

Method One-millimeter-thin section computed tomography scans were performed on five formalin-fixed human cadavers (10 sides). During the MFA, structures, such as the IAC, vestibule and cochlea hidden in the temporal bone were investigated under NNS guidance.

Results All the superficial landmarks, such as the foramen spinosum and ovale were correctly localized by NNS. Deeper landmarks, such as the central part of the IAC lying beneath the surface of the petrous apex could not be localized via NNS. The exact area of bone removal along roof of IAC was determined by using the orientation provided by the probe placed between the basal turn of cochlea and the vestibule. We were able to validate the location of the IAC via a medial to lateral drilling by using the navigation this reference point.

Conclusion The NNS can be used effectively during the MFA, and localizing superficial landmarks on the middle fossa floor with a higher accuracy may prove helpful in identifying the IAC from above. By referring to the cochlea–vestibule junctional area, the exact location of the trace of the IAC can be revealed.

Keywords

middle fossa approach - internal acoustic canal - neuronavigation - petrous

Authors' Contributions

T.A.K. contributed to the investigation, resources, and writing of the original draft.

B.K. was responsible for conceptualization, methodology, and the reviewing and editing of the writing.

A.K. assisted with investigation and resources, while L.A. also contributed to investigation and resources.

N.T. provided supervision and participated in the reviewing and editing of the writing.

G.S.Z. was involved in conceptualization, methodology, and supervision.

Publication History

Received: 26 November 2023

Accepted: 21 December 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
28 December 2023

Article published online:
09 February 2024

• References

• 1 Sanus GZ, Tanriverdi T, Tanriover N, Ulu MO, Uzan M. Hearing preserved traumatic delayed facial nerve paralysis without temporal bone fracture: neurosurgical perspective and experience in the management of 25 cases. Surg Neurol 2009; 71 (03) 304-310 , discussion 310
• 2 Sanuş GZ, Tanriöver N, Tanriverdi T, Uzan M, Akar Z. Late decompression in patients with acute facial nerve paralysis after temporal bone fracture. Turk Neurosurg 2007; 17 (01) 7-12
• 3 Sanna M, Zini C, Mazzoni A. et al. Hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery. Middle fossa versus suboccipital approach. Am J Otol 1987; 8 (06) 500-506
• 4 House WF, Shelton C. Middle fossa approach for acoustic tumor removal. 1992. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2008; 19 (02) 279-288 , vi
• 5 Kawase T, Shiobara R, Toya S. Anterior transpetrosal-transtentorial approach for sphenopetroclival meningiomas: surgical method and results in 10 patients. Neurosurgery 1991; 28 (06) 869-875 , discussion 875–876
• 6 Kawase T, Toya S, Shiobara R, Mine T. Transpetrosal approach for aneurysms of the lower basilar artery. J Neurosurg 1985; 63 (06) 857-861
• 7 Tanriover N, Sanus GZ, Ulu MO. et al. Middle fossa approach: microsurgical anatomy and surgical technique from the neurosurgical perspective. Surg Neurol 2009; 71 (05) 586-596 , discussion 596
• 8 MacDonald JD, Antonelli P, Day AL. The anterior subtemporal, medial transpetrosal approach to the upper basilar artery and ponto-mesencephalic junction. Neurosurgery 1998; 43 (01) 84-89
• 9 Arìstegui M, Cokkeser Y, Saleh E. et al. Surgical anatomy of the extended middle cranial fossa approach. Skull Base Surg 1994; 4 (04) 181-188
• 10 House WF. Surgical exposure of the internal auditory canal and its contents through the middle, cranial fossa. Laryngoscope 1961; 71: 1363-1385
• 11 Catalano PJ, Eden AR. An external reference to identify the internal auditory canal in middle fossa surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993; 108 (02) 111-116
• 12 Garcia-Ibanez E, Garcia-Ibanez JL. Middle fossa vestibular neurectomy: a report of 373 cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1980; 88 (04) 486-490
• 13 Fisch U. Transtemporal surgery of the internal auditory canal. Report of 92 cases, technique, indications and results. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 1970; 17: 203-240
• 14 Fisch U, Mattox D. Microsurgery of the Skull Base. New York: Thieme; 1988
• 15 Hamzaoğlu V, Beger O, Erdoğan O. et al. Radioanatomic assessment of the geniculate ganglion dehiscence and dimension: a cadaveric study. World Neurosurg 2020; 134: e913-e919
• 16 Bulsara KR, Leveque J-C, Gray L, Fukushima T, Friedman AH, Villavicencio AT. Three-dimensional computed tomographic analysis of the relationship between the arcuate eminence and the superior semicircular canal. Neurosurgery 2006; 59 (1, Suppl 1) ONS7-ONS12 , discussion ONS7–ONS12
• 17 Kartush JM, Kemink JL, Graham MD. The arcuate eminence. Topographic orientation in middle cranial fossa surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1985; 94 (1 Pt 1): 25-28
• 18 Seo Y, Ito T, Sasaki T, Nakagawara J, Nakamura H. Assessment of the anatomical relationship between the arcuate eminence and superior semicircular canal by computed tomography. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2007; 47 (08) 335-339 , discussion 339–340
• 19 Peris-Celda M, Perry A, Carlstrom LP, Graffeo CS, Driscoll CLW, Link MJ. Key anatomical landmarks for middle fossa surgery: a surgical anatomy study. J Neurosurg 2018; (November): 1-10
• 20 Komune N, Matsushima K, Matsuo S, Safavi-Abbasi S, Matsumoto N, Rhoton Jr ALJ. The accuracy of an electromagnetic navigation system in lateral skull base approaches. Laryngoscope 2017; 127 (02) 450-459